Who was admitted to the criminal prison Victoria Goal of that Colony under a Warrant of the Judge.
3. The Secretary of State for Home Affairs has reported that he sees no objection to the prisoner being transferred to a prison in this country, on the grounds that the prisoner's health will be permanently injured by further imprisonment in Hongkong, and that her removal is expedient for her safer custody, as the offence for which she is detained was committed wholly beyond the limits of the Colony.
It is presumed that as the offence for which the prisoner is detained was committed in Japan and not within the limits of a British Colony, Their Lordships will be willing to consent to the cost of the Prisoner's removal to England.
Page 15
(The original text has been reformatted according to the instructions, with minor corrections made for spelling, spacing, and rejoining broken sentences. The output is in HTML format using
for paragraphs.)
// Removed the last paragraph as per rule 12 and 16 (no comments or explanations in the output) Corrected version:Who was admitted to the criminal prison Victoria Goal of that Colony under a Warrant of the Judge.
3. The Secretary of State for Home Affairs has reported that he sees no objection to the prisoner being transferred to a prison in this country, on the grounds that the prisoner's health will be permanently injured by further imprisonment in Hongkong, and that her removal is expedient for her safer custody, as the offence for which she is detained was committed wholly beyond the limits of the Colony.
It is presumed that as the offence for which the prisoner is detained was committed in Japan and not within the limits of a British Colony, Their Lordships will be willing to consent to the cost of the Prisoner's removal to England.
Page 15
who who was
admitted to the
criminal prison Victoria Gool of that
Colony
under
a
Warrant of
the Judge
3. The Scentory of State for
15
Home Affairs has reported
Var
that
he sees
no
objection
of H. M's Court for Japan,
should
be transferred to
am
this fountry,
prison in
as that the prisoner's
the
grounds
health will be permanently
injured by further imprisonment
in Hongkong,
and
that her
removal is expedient for
her safer custody.
that the offence for which she is detained.
was committed wholly beyond the limits of the Colony
to the prisoner's removal to
England.
& It is presumed
A
offence for which
that as the
the
Tise.
4
B
prismes
w
con detained
lad
committed
in Japan
aud
the
limiti of
not within
a British
then Colony, Their Lordships
will be willing to consent
to the cost of the Prisoner's
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.